| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
sugacapra
Joined: 18 Jan 2006 Posts: 48 Location: Firenze, Italy
|
Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 11:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
worked perfectly, with epia (C3) cpu performance improved really.
cpu passed from 43% to 24% for zmc
a real gain!!!
thanks all |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
jameswilson
Joined: 08 Jun 2005 Posts: 4997 Location: Midlands UK
|
Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 11:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
i ownder what difference sse3 would make. I must say that the increases in performance seem huge. But obviously only in the jpeg creating department. zma in modetc/mocord obviously still uses the bulk of cpu time. Is there a way of helping these processes or does analysing images take this power regardless due to the nature of the beast _________________ James Wilson
Disclaimer: The above is pure theory and may work on a good day with the wind behind it. etc etc.
http://www.securitywarehouse.co.uk |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dbosso
Joined: 21 Jul 2005 Posts: 18 Location: Goleta, California
|
Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 1:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Still working great here on my home system with one camera.
I wish I could apply it to my AMD64 8 camera system. I may have to re-do that box as 32bit just for the boost from this library.
-David |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jameswilson
Joined: 08 Jun 2005 Posts: 4997 Location: Midlands UK
|
Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 5:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
did you notice any major speed gains of 64bit over 32 bit? Obviously there are gains with the mmx but i wouldnt have thought in this application there were big gains in 64 bit, but i may be way off!! lol _________________ James Wilson
Disclaimer: The above is pure theory and may work on a good day with the wind behind it. etc etc.
http://www.securitywarehouse.co.uk |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dbosso
Joined: 21 Jul 2005 Posts: 18 Location: Goleta, California
|
Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 5:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's got 6GB of RAM and there are some other things running on it, so I'd like to avoid taking the himem IO performance hit.
I doubt there'd be much of a processor performance difference going to 32bit, other than the huge gains i'd be able to get by using the jpeg-simd lib.
-David |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jameswilson
Joined: 08 Jun 2005 Posts: 4997 Location: Midlands UK
|
Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 5:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
6GIG whats it running?? _________________ James Wilson
Disclaimer: The above is pure theory and may work on a good day with the wind behind it. etc etc.
http://www.securitywarehouse.co.uk |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
essup
Joined: 13 Jun 2006 Posts: 77
|
Posted: Fri Sep 08, 2006 7:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
| jpeg-mmx also now works for me on slackware-current. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
yod9999
Joined: 14 Jul 2006 Posts: 25
|
Posted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 7:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i'd just like to reiterate how much difference this alternative libjpeg makes. on a via epia en12000 with one local camera in record mode capturing in colour at 3fps and 640x480, user cpu usage (almost all zma) dropped from ~27% to ~11%. quite impressive. don't know how it'll perform long term yet, but loks good so far
neil |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
unclerichy
Joined: 25 Feb 2004 Posts: 67
|
Posted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 10:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's improved my system's ability to monitor a camera on-screen at 352x288 whilst capturing events from up to three cameras with less chance that frames will be lost.
EDIT: Probably shouldn't post last thing at night...
Last edited by unclerichy on Thu Sep 21, 2006 6:42 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jameswilson
Joined: 08 Jun 2005 Posts: 4997 Location: Midlands UK
|
Posted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 11:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
im starting to be convinced by its long term stabiliuty too _________________ James Wilson
Disclaimer: The above is pure theory and may work on a good day with the wind behind it. etc etc.
http://www.securitywarehouse.co.uk |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Flash_
Joined: 11 Jan 2006 Posts: 362
|
Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 12:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ok, a bit behind the rest of you, but I've just installed the libs on both my Quad Xeon and the Athlon-64.
Both OS's running Debian Etch (Testing), both CPU sets have MMX capabilities. (Confirmed with cpuid)
Install as given by james.
make install failed on both machines due to:
/usr/bin/install: cannot create regular file `/usr/local/man/man1/cjpeg.1': No such file or directory
Easily fixed with a "mkdir /usr/local/man/man1" (Both my installs only had man4). Re-run make install, fine.
Xeon load before: 3.16 after: 1.86 (Rising to 2.50 depending on alarms)
Athlon load before: 0.86 after: 0.35 (Rising to 0.
No difference in usage that I can see. Thanks dbosso |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SyRenity
Joined: 24 Jan 2005 Posts: 301
|
Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 3:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Flash.
So this library does run on 64-bit CPU? I recall there were remarks that the 64-bit support is not complete. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Flash_
Joined: 11 Jan 2006 Posts: 362
|
Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 3:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I suspect that's referring to a 64-bit OS.
I'm running a 32-bit kernel on a 64-bit CPU so as far as software's concerned, it's 32-bit. Sorry I didn't make that clear. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SyRenity
Joined: 24 Jan 2005 Posts: 301
|
Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 11:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi.
Thanks for the information. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jan
Joined: 20 May 2006 Posts: 17 Location: europe
|
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2006 3:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i can confirm good results on a Celeron 2.53GHz (512ram) with 2x DCS-900 (640x480 ~6fps) on modect (avg. 60% active area)
load average dropped from .6 to .4
idle CPU went from 66% to 76%  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|